Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper analyzes the double-z model of persuasion, highlighting the roles of certainty and doubt in rhetoric.
This paper introduces and explains the double-z model of persuasion, which applies to the mental instances of certainty and doubt, modeled here as theoretical constructs. They stand in a dialectical relationship with each other in rhetorical events. The category of zertum is of particular importance in the core process of persuasion, which is associated with the term dogma here. A dense structural and functional analysis of a short scene from Shakespeare's Othello is followed by a theoretical discussion in which the double-z model is formalized and explained in detail. The final section concentrates on theoretical questions of pragmatics. The role of framings and communicative embeddings of the double-z structure is treated, as well as the evaluation consequences of assignments to certain types of communication (to rhetoric or manipulation).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joachim Knape (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: