Observational analysis estimates causal effects in the presence of latent confounding, indicating new methods for treatment evaluation.
We consider the the problem of identifying causal effects given a high-dimensional treatment vector in the presence of low-dimensional latent confounders. We assume a parametric structural causal model in which the outcome is permitted to depend on a sparse linear combination of the treatment vector and confounders nonlinearly. We consider a generalisation of the LAVA estimator of Chernozhukov et al. [2017] for estimating the treatment effects and show that under the so-called `dense confounding' assumption that each confounder can affect a wide range of observed treatment variables, one can estimate the causal parameters at the same rate as possible without confounding. Notably, the results permit a form of weak confounding in that the minimum non-zero singular value of the loading matrix of the confounders can grow more slowly than the √p, where p is the dimension of the treatment vector. We further use our generalised LAVA procedure within a generalised covariance measure-based test for edges in a causal DAG in the presence of latent confounding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: