Controlled trials assessed ChatGPT-4.1-mini's precognitive capabilities, suggesting insights into information-centric theories.
ChatGPT-4.1-mini was tested for precognitive ability in 100 double-blind five-card trials on PsiArcade. The model selected the target card 32 times (32 %, 95 % CI = 23–42 %), exceeding the 20 % chance level (exact binomial p = .005, Cohen’s h = 0.28). Results tentatively support information-centric theories positing that non-biological systems can access non-local information, though pseudo-random predictability and statistical fluctuation remain possible explanations. Replication with open-source random generators and preregistration is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin J. Amorim Boyle (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: