Cohort study assesses stool diagnostic performance in children, suggesting effective noninvasive alternatives.
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends stool as an alternative respiratory sample (RS) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in children <10 years. This study assessed stool-Xpert-Ultra diagnostic performance against microbiologically confirmed (MC-PTB) cases identified based on the composite reference standard (CRS) in children <15 years, stratified by age and nutritional status. Methods Children <15 years with presumptive PTB were assessed at two tertiary-care hospitals in Pakistan. Stools and RS were tested using Xpert MTB/RIF-Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) and culture. Using the CRS, PTB cases were MC-PTB or clinically confirmed. Nutritional status was classified using WHO criteria. Stool-Xpert-Ultra diagnostic performance was assessed against MC-PTB or positive RS-Xpert-Ultra. Logistic regression identified predictors of microbiological yields. Results Among 650 children, we obtained 587 RS, 258 stool and 195 both stool and RS. Of 650, 264 (41%) had MC and 136 (21%) had clinically confirmed PTB. Stool-Xpert-Ultra had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 47%, 88%, 77%, and 72%, 73%, 72% against MC-PTB in children <10 and ≥10, respectively. Stool-Xpert-Ultra performed similarly against RS-Xpert-Ultra in each age group. Stool-Xpert-Ultra detected 11% additional MC-PTB cases when RS was negative or unavailable. Stool-Xpert-Ultra had high sensitivity (64%) in severely acute malnourished (SAM) children. Age ≥10, female, SAM and TB-consistent chest X-rays were strongly associated with stool and RS microbiological positivity. Conclusions Stool-Xpert-Ultra demonstrated moderate sensitivity against MC-PTB in <10. It identified additional MC-PTB cases when RS was unavailable or/negative, making it a valuable noninvasive alternative, especially in children ≥10 and with SAM, where it missed fewer cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aurangzeb et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: