Claims analysis shows low mental health service utilization among cancer survivors, indicating disparities by age and ethnicity.
Background Childhood cancer survivors face long-term psychological challenges, including depression, trauma/stress, and anxiety. However, objective assessments of mental health service utilization among child and young adult (YA) survivors of childhood cancer remain limited. We examined mental health care utilization among publicly-insured childhood cancer survivors and disparities by sociodemographic and neighborhood-level factors. Methods Using multistate public insurance claims data, we identified 5,946 survivors (diagnosed ≤21 years) who completed cancer therapy; initiated treatment episode(s) for depression, trauma/stress, or anxiety post-cancer-therapy; and maintained continuous coverage. Logistic regressions examined factors associated with having any mental health visit and ≥4 visits within 12 weeks of treatment episode initiation in children (ages 3-17) and YAs (ages 18-39). Results Among 4,052 child treatment episodes, 54.6% were in females, 41.5% non-Hispanic White, and 27.4% Hispanic; demographics were similar across 3,871 YA episodes. Utilization was highest among survivors aged 3–11 (any visit: 73.4%; ≥4 visits: 39.8%), followed by those aged 12–17 (67.8%; 33.2%), 18–26 (51.9%; 20.2%), and 27–39 (43.3%; 16.4%). Hispanic children were less likely than non-Hispanic White peers to have ≥4 mental health visits (marginal effect=-8.73 percentage points; 95% CI=-12.78, -4.68), as were children in most (vs. least) deprived neighborhoods (marginal effect=-8.80 percentage points; 95% CI=-14.07, -3.53). Similar disparities were observed for any mental health visit. Conclusion Mental health service utilization was low among publicly-insured childhood cancer survivors following mental health diagnosis, with notable disparities by age, ethnicity, and geographic location, underscoring the need for interventions to improve psychological support in this underserved population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: