This analysis reveals early mortality is higher in female patients post biological aortic root replacement, suggesting the need for tailored strategies.
Objective: Gender disparities in cardiovascular outcomes remain underexplored in complex valvular procedures such as aortic root replacement (ARR). This study evaluates sex-based differences in early postoperative outcomes and long-term survival following biological ARR using stentless or bio-Bentall techniques. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 291 patients (202 males and 89 females) who underwent biological ARR between 2003 and 2023 was performed. Propensity score matching yielded 79 gender-matched pairs. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared. Cox regression identified predictors of long-term mortality. Results: Before matching, females were older and had higher logistic EuroSCORE, more severe NYHA class, and greater renal impairment. Bio-Bentall procedures were more frequent in males. After matching, males had higher rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (10.1% vs. 0%; p = 0.004), while females had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (12.7% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.016). No significant sex differences were observed in atrial fibrillation, low cardiac output syndrome, or tracheostomy. Ten-year survival was comparable (female: 79.2%; male: 74.3%; p = 0.792). Independent predictors of late mortality included peripheral vascular disease (HR 2.652; p = 0.005), previous cardiac surgery (HR 2.684; p = 0.002), and age (HR 1.044/year; p < 0.001). Gender was not associated with late mortality (HR 1.368; p = 0.368). Conclusions: Although long-term survival was similar, women experienced significantly higher early mortality following ARR. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into sex-specific vulnerabilities and perioperative optimization strategies tailored to female patients undergoing biological ARR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Comanici et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: