PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2025Journal of information technology, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence.2 citations

Responsible AI for AI Sustainable Future: Governance, Ethics, and The Reality Behind the Promise

View Full Paper
AAAtianashie Miracle AMKMark K. KuffourBKBernard Kyiewu

Key Points

  • Responsible AI governance emphasizes fairness, accountability, and transparency, yet implementation remains inconsistent, especially in low-resource areas.
  • Despite a consensus on ethical frameworks, real-world applications of AI often fall short due to organizational constraints and commercial pressures.
  • Environmental sustainability is often overlooked in AI discussions, even though evidence shows a substantial carbon footprint associated with its deployment.
  • Finding a balance between ethical goals and practical realities requires interdisciplinary collaboration and strong institutional commitment.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has emerged as a powerful force shaping global development, offering promising solutions across health, education, climate change, and governance. However, its rapid integration into critical sectors raises urgent questions about ethics, governance, and sustainability. This systematic review explores the promise and practice of responsible AI through the lens of three core objectives: the governance mechanisms guiding AI implementation, the ethical frameworks shaping its design, and the practical realities influencing its deployment across contexts. Drawing from sixty peer-reviewed articles published between 2017 and 2024, the review identifies strong global consensus on foundational principles such as fairness, accountability, and transparency. Nonetheless, a significant implementation gap persists, particularly in low-resource settings, where enforcement mechanisms and institutional readiness are often lacking. The findings also reveal that ethical commitments are frequently undermined by organizational constraints and commercial interests, leading to surface-level adherence without substantive change. Environmental sustainability, a critical dimension of responsible AI, remains underrepresented in current governance discussions despite mounting evidence of AI’s carbon footprint. This review contributes to the growing body of scholarship advocating for inclusive, enforceable, and context-sensitive approaches to responsible AI. It underscores the need for deeper engagement with the political, social, and environmental realities that shape AI’s impact on sustainable development. Ultimately, bridging the gap between AI’s ethical aspirations and real-world outcomes requires not only technical innovation but also strong institutional leadership, interdisciplinary collaboration, and meaningful stakeholder participation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f17f111f11f0e857c53721https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2025.v2.i2.012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Atlas of AI2021 · 1,263 citations
  2. 2Clarity, surprises, and further questions in the Article 29 Working Party draft guidance on automated decision-making and profiling2018 · 159 citations
  3. 3How AI can be a force for good2018 · 703 citations
  4. 4Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract2017 · 468 citations
  5. 5Value Sensitive Design2019 · 815 citations