Conceptual model illustrates interaction of linguistic, pedagogical, and multimodal factors in early childhood digital content evaluation, suggesting new guidelines.
This study aimed to propose a foundational integrated analytical framework for evaluating early childhood digital content, based on a systematic review of literature from 2015 to 2025. Through inductive content analysis of 52 selected studies, six interrelated domains were identified: (1) Linguistic Quality, (2) Cognitive and Pedagogical Design, (3) Developmental Appropriateness, (4) Multimodal Design, (5) Cultural and Social Representation, and (6) Accessibility and Ethics. These domains were synthesized into a conceptual model illustrating how linguistic, pedagogical, and multimodal dimensions interact under the moderating influence of developmental appropriateness, while cultural and ethical dimensions ensure inclusivity and child protection. The framework contributes theoretically by integrating developmental and media literacy perspectives, and practically by providing evaluation guidelines for educators, parents, and content developers. This pre-validation model lays the groundwork for future Delphi validation and empirical testing toward a standardized tool for assessing early childhood digital content quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiyoung Lee (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: