Retrospective analysis evaluates the effect of corneal storage containers on endothelial cell loss and density.
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of different corneal storage containers—with and without corneal holders—on endothelial cell density (ECD) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) during organ culture, following a temporary shortage of Böhnke Donor Corneal Holders at a German eye bank. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 383 human donor corneas cultured in six types of containers between January and September 2024 at the Eye Bank of Rhineland-Palatinate. ECD was measured at 6.0 ± 1.2 days (ECD1) and again at 14.9 ± 4.4 days (ECD2) after retrieval using standardized organ culture protocols with an inverted light microscope. Group 1 (G1) used the standard 50 mL Corning® flask with the Böhnke corneal holder. Groups 2–6 used alternative containers, with or without corneal holders. ECL was defined as the difference between ECD2 and ECD1. Results: Mean overall ECD1 was 2478.3 ± 843.4 cells/mm2. G1 showed ECD1 < 2000 cells/mm2 in 29% of corneas and low ECL (−1%). The 60 mL Ratiolab® flask with Cornea-Claw® was the best alternative, showing the lowest incidence of ECD1 < 2000 cells/mm2 (7%) and no ECL. Containers without corneal holders, particularly the 100 mL Sterilin™ and 15 mL Cryogenic Tube®, had significantly higher rates of ECD1 < 2000 (40% and 75%) and greater ECL (9% and 14%). Conclusions: Container design, especially volume and the presence of corneal holders, significantly influences endothelial preservation. Especially a lack of corneal holders led to unacceptable endothelial cell loss. Eye banks should prioritize appropriate flask configurations to minimize tissue deterioration, particularly during supply shortages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: