This analysis shows cumulative emission reductions in China's iron and steel sector, indicating needed policy balance.
As an energy-intensive sector, China’s iron and steel industry is crucial for achieving “Dual Carbon” goals. This study fills the research gap in systematically comparing the synergistic effects of multiple policies by evaluating five key measures (2020–2023) in ultra-low-emission retrofits and clean energy alternatives. Using public macro-data at the national level, this study quantified cumulative reductions in air pollutants (SO2, NOx, PM, VOCs) and CO2. A synergistic control effect coordinate system and a normalized synergistic emission reduction equivalent (APeq) model were employed. The results reveal significant differences: Sintering machine desulfurization and denitrification (SDD) showed the highest APeq but increased CO2 emissions in 2023. Dust removal equipment upgrades (DRE) and unorganized emission control (UEC) demonstrated stable co-reduction effects. While electric furnace short-process steelmaking (ES) and hydrogen metallurgy (HM) showed limited current benefits, they represent crucial deep decarbonization pathways. The framework provides multi-dimensional policy insights beyond simple ranking, suggesting balancing short-term pollution control with long-term transition by prioritizing clean alternatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: