Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 17, 2025

Mapping the Ethical Landscape of GenAI: Insights from Applied Linguistics Publication Policies

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MAMuhammad AkbarTadulako UniversityKNKomal NazGovernment College Women University Faisalabad

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Analysis reveals differing guidelines for generative AI use in 76 applied linguistics journals, highlighting ethical concerns.

Key Points

  • The study shows significant discrepancies in generative AI guidelines among academic journals, affecting research integrity.
  • Only 50% of analyzed journals provided any guidelines on AI authorship, with varying comprehensiveness across the board.
  • A checklist with 17 elements was used to assess three dimensions: authorship, use cases, and human responsibility.
  • The findings suggest that improved GenAI policies are essential for responsible academic practices among authors.

Cite This Study

Akbar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f199c5de32064e504dcd50https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct243
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1“BECAUSE I SPEAK JIBBALI …”: A CASE STUDY OF THE USE OF MINORITY LANGUAGES IN DHOFARI EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS2024
  2. 2<scp>TESOL</scp>as a Professional Community: A Half‐Century of Pedagogy, Research, and Theory2015 · 112 citations
  3. 3The Ownership of English in Japanese Secondary Schools2003 · 206 citations
  4. 4Evolving the <scp>TESOL</scp> Teaching–Research Nexus2019 · 156 citations