This analysis identifies optimal energy-saving strategies for substation buildings, suggesting influence from U-values and design parameters.
Against the backdrop of the global energy crisis and the “dual carbon” goals (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality), the passive energy-saving design of substation buildings in cold regions faces severe challenges. This study systematically conducts a decomposed analysis of the shape coefficient, thermal performance of the building envelope (including external walls, internal walls, roofs, and external windows), and window-to-wall ratio of substation buildings in cold regions, quantifies the degree of influence of each factor, and proposes corresponding energy-saving design strategies. This study took a 110 kV substation in Yuhua District, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, as the research object. A building energy consumption model was established based on DeST (2023) software, and the influence of the building shape coefficient, U-values of the envelope structure (external walls, internal walls, roofs, external windows), and window-to-wall ratio on the building’s cooling and heating loads was analyzed using the numerical simulation and control variable methods. Leveraging a rigorously validated, high-resolution simulation framework, we quantitatively dissect the marginal energy penalties and payoffs of every passive design variable governing fully indoor substations in cold-climate zones. The resultant multidimensional response surfaces are distilled into a deterministic, climate-specific passive energy-saving protocol that secures heating-energy savings of up to 43% without compromising electrical safety or operational accessibility. (1) Reducing the shape coefficient can significantly lower the heat load, and it is recommended to control it at 0.35–0.40; (2) The thermal performance of the envelope structure has a differential effect: the energy-saving effect is optimal when the U-value of external walls is 0.20–0.30 W/(m2·K) and the U-value of roofs is ≤0.25 W/(m2·K). A U-value of 2.4 W/(m2·K) is recommended for external windows, while the internal wall exerts a weak influence; (3) The window-to-wall ratio should be controlled by orientation: east-facing/north-facing ≤ 0.20, south-facing ≤ 0.35, and west-facing ≤ 0.30. Based on the above results, a comprehensive energy-saving strategy of “compact form–high-efficiency envelope–limited window-to-wall ratio” is proposed, which provides theoretical support and technical pathways for the energy-saving design of substation buildings in cold areas. Compared with existing substation buildings, the recommended parameters yield a significant reduction in total life-cycle carbon emissions and hold important practical significance for realizing the “dual carbon” goals (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality) of the power system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: