Study reveals sex impacts lower limb biomechanics in individuals with unilateral functional ankle instability, indicating targeted rehabilitation may be needed.
Objective To investigate sex differences in lower limb biomechanics during single-leg drop landing in individuals with unilateral Functional Ankle Instability (FAI). Methods Twenty individuals with unilateral FAI (10 males/10 females) performed single-leg drop landings on unstable and stable limbs respectively. Kinematic data were captured using a Vicon motion capture system, and kinetic data were collected using force plates. Data were analyzed using a 2 × 2 (Sex × Side) mixed-design ANOVA. Results Significant main effects of Sex were observed for hip flexion and abduction angles at both IC and peak vGRF, with females showing greater hip flexion ( p = 0.005; p = 0.023) and smaller hip abduction ( p = 0.026; p = 0.003) than males. A significant main effect of Sex was also found for ankle inversion at IC, with females exhibiting greater inversion than males ( p = 0.005). For ankle plantarflexion at IC, a significant Sex × Side interaction was detected ( p = 0.020); simple effects analysis revealed that females had reduced plantarflexion on the unstable side compared to their stable side ( p = 0.010). For peak vGRF, a significant Sex × Side interaction was observed ( p = 0.013); post hoc tests indicated that females had higher peak vGRF on the unstable side than males ( p = 0.008) and their own stable side ( p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for knee joint angles, T_vGRF, LR, ΔL, or K leg ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Female individuals with FAI employ a hip-dominant compensatory strategy (increased flexion/reduced abduction) and exhibit greater ankle inversion than males. On the unstable side, they demonstrate reduced plantarflexion compared to their stable side. Males with FAI primarily adopt a joint stiffening strategy with restricted motion. Future research on FAI should incorporate sex differentiation in biomechanical assessments to develop targeted rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: