Analysis reveals variations in phenotypic traits and grain quality in wheat genotypes under drought stress, suggesting avenues for improved crop resilience.
Wheat production and grain quality are adversely affected by drought stress. The deployment of wheat genotypes with improved grain yield and grain quality assists in achieving food security and maintaining a balanced diet. Therefore, this study is aimed at evaluating the phenotypic traits and grain quality responses of wheat genotypes to drought-stressed conditions. Two field trials were conducted to evaluate ten wheat genotypes under drought-stressed (DS) and non-stressed (NS) conditions in 2022 and 2023. The grains of the genotypes were further evaluated for their quality. The recorded phenotypic traits include grain yield (GY), shoot biomass (SB), root biomass (RB), and harvest index (HI). The grain quality traits recorded were grain carbon content (C), nitrogen (N), and crude protein (CP). Significant (p < 0.05) genetic variation were observed for the recorded phenotypic and grain quality traits. The highest grain yield was recorded in LM48 (495.83 g m−2), and the least was observed in BW141 (131.48 g m−2) under DS conditions. The N ranged from 1.76% recorded in LM75 to 3.16% (BW141) under DS conditions. The wheat genotypes, LM48 and BW140, presented high harvest index percentages, which indicates that the genotypes were efficient in partitioning their biomass to GY production even under DS conditions. The overall mean values of C and CP were lower under DS than NS conditions. Furthermore, GY was positively associated with SB (r = 0.50 under DS; r = 0.49 under NS) and RB (r = 0.38 under DS conditions; r = 0.32 under NS conditions). Amongst all the evaluated quality traits, only CP was negatively correlated with GY (r = −0.02) under DS conditions. Based on high GY production performance under DS conditions, the wheat genotypes LM48 and BW140 are recommended for further evaluation across diverse environments and production under limited water conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mutanda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: