Multi-case study identifies strategies to mitigate deficit mindsets in continuous improvement work, suggesting pathways for system transformation.
Introduction Continuous improvement (CI) has transformative potential but far too often that potential is unrealized. Practitioners engaging in CI are frequently guided by mindsets that derail system transformation by shifting the focus from improving systems to fixing people. Methods Employing multiple data sources (document analysis of dissertations in practice and interviews) this multi-case study examines nine cases of scholar-practitioners engaging in CI work and how they mitigated the impact of deficit mindsets. Results Cross-case analysis revealed four strategies for disrupting deficit ideology in CI work: composing intentional teams, building team capacity, employing critical theory, and involving those impacted. Discussion Implications for engaging in CI and teaching CI are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hinnant-Crawford et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: