Cross-sectional analysis reveals empathy, mindfulness, and personality traits influence STEM performance in students.
Introduction Traditional models of academic achievement in STEM fields predominantly emphasize cognitive ability, overlooking the influence of psychosocial factors. Recent research in holistic and social-emotional learning has found that attributes such as empathy, mindfulness, personal values, and personality traits may contribute to learning and performance outcomes. This study examines the associative value of these psychosocial factors toward early STEM proficiency in Indian university students. Methods A cross-sectional design was employed with two samples. Sample 1 ( n = 580) completed self-report measures assessing trait empathy (IRI), personal values (PVQ-RR), personality (IPIP-BFM-50), and trait mindfulness (FFMQ-39), along with self-reported high school STEM academic scores in mathematics and science. A smaller subset, Sample 2 ( n = 97), participated in a 50-min Ā n ā p ā nasati-derived breath-based meditation induction followed by the Amsterdam Resting-State Questionnaire (ARSQ) self-report administration to assess state mindfulness. Correlations were followed by hierarchical regression analyses, controlling for gender, university STEM status, and their interactions, to determine the incremental predictive value of the psychosocial variables. Results Findings revealed that cognitive empathy (especially, perspective-taking) and self-direction values were modest yet significantly associated with academic performance, particularly in science. Additionally, openness to experience emerged as a positive correlate, while state mindfulness—specifically the planning dimension—showed robust associations with higher academic scores. Hierarchical models confirmed that these variables contributed incremental variance beyond traditional demographic controls. Discussion The findings support a multidimensional understanding of early STEM proficiency, wherein psychosocial facets complement cognitive ability in shaping academic outcomes. These results have implications for educational interventions, emphasizing the integration of socio-emotional learning and mindfulness training in STEM curricula.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brahmi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: