Study reveals how magnetization exchange impacts T1 relaxation times of tryptophan and NAD in the brain, suggesting methods for better in vivo quantification.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of magnetization exchange on the measurement of tryptophan and NAD + T 1 relaxation times and to determine the magnetization exchange rates with a two‐spin system model using downfield 1 H MRS spectroscopy at 7 T in human brain. Methods We collected downfield 1 H MRS spectra in the human brain of eight healthy volunteers using a spectrally selective single‐slice sequence (excitation window: 9.7 ± 2 ppm) at 7 T. Alternating selective and broadband saturation recovery experiments were performed to probe magnetization transfer‐dependent changes in T 1 recovery. The apparent T 1 was modeled independently for each experiment for the tryptophan resonance at 10.1 ppm and for the NAD + resonances at 9.3, 9.1, and 8.9 ppm. The magnetization exchange rate was modeled explicitly using a two‐spin model to fit both experiments simultaneously. Results The apparent T 1 relaxation times measured from broadband saturation recovery experiments were significantly longer for each resonance compared to those measured from selective saturation ( p < 0.001). The ratio of broadband to selective T 1 was significantly larger for tryptophan than NAD + (TRP: 19 ± 6 vs. NAD + : 9 ± 3; p < 0.01). Using the two‐spin model, we modeled the T 1 of each resonance (ms): T 1,TRP = 622.3 ± 405.5; T 1,NAD,H2 = 924.9 ± 233.7; T 1,NAD,H6 = 1800.0 ± 985.5; T 1,NAD,H4 = 2057.3 ± 573.5. The chemical exchange rate of tryptophan was 12.3 ± 3.1 Hz; the cross‐relaxation rates of NAD + were (Hz): σ NAD,H2 = 5.7 ± 1.6, σ NAD,H6 = 3.3 ± 0.8, and σ NAD,H4 = 3.0 ± 1.5. The tryptophan exchange rate was significantly faster than the rates for NAD + ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Tryptophan chemical exchange and NAD + cross‐relaxation with water can be quantified in vivo in human brain at 7 T using downfield spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swago et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: