Doctrinal analysis highlights legal gaps in electronic land title deeds and cybersecurity risks in Tanzania.
This study provides an analysis of electronic land title deeds and the issuance of electronic documents in Tanzania Mainland, focusing on the legal, procedural, and technological aspects of digitised land administration. Traditionally, land registration in Tanzania relied on manual, paper-based processes that were slow, susceptible to errors, and vulnerable to fraudulent practices. To address these challenges, the government introduced the Integrated Land Management Information System (ILMIS) to digitise land records, improve efficiency, enhance transparency, and reduce delays in the issuance of land titles. Despite this technological advancement, existing laws, including the Land Act [Cap. 113 R.E. 2025], Village Land Act [Cap. 114 R.E. 2024], Land Registration Act [Cap. 334 R.E. 2023], and Evidence Act [Cap. 6 R.E. 2022] continue to assume paper-based systems, creating gaps in procedural clarity, recognition of electronic documents, dispute resolution, and data security. Using a doctrinal approach, the study critically examines statutes, regulations, policies, and scholarly literature to analyse how electronic land title deeds are issued and the challenges arising from the current legal framework. The findings indicate that statutory recognition for electronic titles remains limited, definitions for digital processes are largely absent, institutional adoption is slow, cybersecurity risks are significant, and legal mechanisms for resolving disputes involving electronic documents are underdeveloped. These issues limit the full operational potential of ILMIS and create uncertainty for landowners, investors, and government institutions. The study highlights the need for legal and institutional reforms to strengthen the issuance of electronic land title deeds. Recommended measures include updating existing land laws to formally recognise electronic titles, incorporating digital procedures into the Registration of Documents Act, amending the Evidence Act to account for electronic records, establishing subsidiary regulations for e-titles, and integrating robust cybersecurity safeguards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdulswamad Haji Sunna (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: