Qualitative descriptive study reveals factors affecting interpersonal communication competence in nurse leaders, highlighting the role of training and support.
Aim(s) To describe nurse leaders' perceptions of factors related to the development of their own interpersonal communication competence. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Methods Individual semi–structured interviews were conducted with 21 nurse leaders in three wellbeing service counties in Finland. Data were collected between February and April 2024 and analysed using an inductive content analysis. Results The analysis identified two main categories, each comprising several subcategories: (1) individual factors related to development, which encompassed participants' perceptions on how inherent qualities, personal experiences, reflexivity, motivation and communication training were related to the development of interpersonal communication competence, and (2) interpersonal factors related to development , which demonstrated the role of situational contexts, feedback and social support in competence development. Conclusion This study frames the development of nurse leaders' interpersonal communication competence as a lifelong and continuous process. The findings emphasise the interplay of individual and interpersonal factors, encompassing various competence categories and dimensions. This dynamic underscores the importance of developing interpersonal communication competence in workplaces through various practices, in addition to formal communication training. Implication for the Profession The findings enhance our understanding of nurse leaders' interpersonal communication competence and the factors related to it. The study also identifies various practices for fostering nurse leaders' communication competence. Impact The study provides valuable insights for healthcare organisations and educational institutions by highlighting the importance of providing nurse leaders with opportunities to promote their interpersonal communication competence through both formal communication training and their daily work activities. Reporting Method Reporting adhered to the SRQR checklist. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public Involvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kämäräinen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: