Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis explores maṣlaḥah mursalah's application in Sharia financing for UMKM, suggesting potential credit sales.
This study aims to revisit the cash-only trading principle practiced by Abdurrahman bin Auf. In today’s context, where UMKM rely heavily on flexible financing, his rejection of credit sales seems less compatible. Therefore, this research seeks to reinterpret his principle using the concept of maṣlaḥah mursalah to explore its adaptability in Sharia-compliant financing for modern UMKM. This study adopts a qualitative library-based approach by examining various relevant literature sources. The research finds that Abdurrahman’s cash-only policy remains ethically sound, upholding contract clarity, fairness, and avoidance of riba. However, through the framework of maṣlaḥah mursalah, Sharia-compliant credit mechanisms such as deferred-payment murabahah and musyarakah are permissible when free from usury, clearly defined, and based on mutual consent. These tools allow for flexible UMKM financing while preserving Islamic ethical standards. This study is normative and conceptual in nature, lacking empirical field data. Further research is needed to assess the practical application of these financing models among UMKM actors in real-world settings. The study contributes to the discourse on Islamic business ethics and adaptive legal reasoning. It provides a theoretical framework for integrating traditional Islamic principles with modern economic needs, supporting inclusive and ethical Sharia-based financing models for UMKM in contemporary contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aisyah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: