Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 17, 2025Open Access

An in-vitro Evaluation of Microleakage and Microhardness of Short Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Composite Resin Inlays in Compound Cavity in Molars

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RARUKMINI AMARNATHBPB.K. Raghu PrasadRSRashmi G Shetty

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

In vitro study compares microleakage and hardness in SFRC and composite inlays, suggesting differing outcomes.

Key Points

  • Indirect CAD/CAM inlays showed no microleakage, significantly outperforming direct and semidirect techniques.
  • Direct SFRC restorations had a higher microhardness (Mean = 58.8) than both indirect (Mean = 22.0) and semidirect inlays (Mean = 20.4).
  • Standardized Class II cavities were prepared in 30 extracted molars, with evaluations conducted under significant statistical analysis.
  • Considering sealing ability and durability is crucial for clinical decisions on restoration methods.

Cite This Study

AMARNATH et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f19f1ade32064e504ddae3https://doi.org/10.9734/ajds/2025/v8i1273
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fracture resistance, marginal integrity, and microleakage of indirect composite and computer-aided designed–computer-aided manufactured ceramic inlays in Class II MOD cavities: An in vitro study2026
  2. 2Clinical performance of short fiber-reinforced and indirect resin composites in class I and class II restorations: A three-year randomized clinical trial2025
  3. 3Microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations restored with conventional, bulk-fill, and short fiber-reinforced composites with or without polyethylene fiber reinforcement: a comparative in vitro study2026
  4. 4Effect of deep marginal elevation with different intermediate materials on the fracture resistance of direct and indirect final composite restorations: an in vitro study2026
  5. 5Comparative Evaluation of Coronal Microleakage in Class-I Cavities Restored with Five Different Direct Composite Resins: An In vitro Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study2026