Analysis shows hydrogen applications in heating and transport efficiency, highlighting low-emission potential.
Application of low-emission hydrogen production methods in the decarbonization process remains a highly relevant topic, particularly in the context of sustainable hydrogen value chains. This study evaluates hydrogen applications beyond industry, focusing on its role as an energy carrier and applying multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to assess economics, environmental impact, efficiency, and technological readiness. The analysis confirmed that hydrogen use for heating was the most competitive non-industrial application (ranking first in 66%), with favorable efficiency and costs. Power generation placed among the top two alternatives in 75% of cases. Transport end-use was less suitable due to compression requirements, raising emissions to 272–371 g CO2/kg H2 and levelizing the cost of hydrogen (LCOH) to 13–17 EUR/kg. When H2 transport was included, new pipelines and compressed H2 clearly outperformed other methods for short- and long-distances, adding only 3.2–3.9% to overall LCOH. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that electricity price variations had a stronger influence on LCOH than capital expenditures. Comparing electrolysis technologies yielded that, proton-exchange membrane and solid oxide reduced costs by 12–20% and CO2 emissions by 15–25% compared to alkaline. The study highlights heating end-use and compressed hydrogen and pipeline transport, proving MCDA to be useful for selecting scalable pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polakovičová et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: