Analysis reveals antiferromagnetic superexchange interactions in CuO2 layers, suggesting implications for magnetic behavior.
Many microscopic models with the interaction between the next-nearest neighbors as a key parameter for cuprate physics have inspired us to study the diagonal superexchange interaction in a CuO₂ layer. Our investigation shows that models with extended hopping provide a correct representation of magnetic interactions only in a hypothetical square CuO₂ layer, where the diagonal superexchange interaction with the next-nearest neighbors always has an antiferromagnetic (AFM) nature. The conclusions are based on the symmetry prohibition on the ferromagnetic contribution to the diagonal superexchange between the next-nearest neighbors for a simple square CuO₂ layer rather than for a real CuO₂ layer, where diagonal AFM superexchange may be overestimated. We also discuss the reasons for magnetic frustration effects and high sensitivity of spin nanoinhomogeneity to square symmetry breaking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gavrichkov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: