PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2020Eurosurveillance8,215 citationsOpen Access

Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

View Full Paper
VCVictor M. CormanOLOlfert LandtMKMarco Kaiser

Key Points

  • A validated real-time RT-PCR workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV and discriminates the novel virus from SARS-CoV without requiring initial viral isolates.
  • Testing across 297 original clinical specimens containing a spectrum of respiratory viruses confirmed assay exclusivity using synthetic nucleic acid design.
  • Network coordination across public laboratories provides synthetic nucleic acid controls, supporting international diagnostic readiness for 2019-nCoV.

Abstract

Background The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travellers does already occur. Aim We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available. Methods Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology. Results The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV. Through coordination between academic and public laboratories, we confirmed assay exclusivity based on 297 original clinical specimens containing a full spectrum of human respiratory viruses. Control material is made available through European Virus Archive – Global (EVAg), a European Union infrastructure project. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the enormous response capacity achieved through coordination of academic and public laboratories in national and European research networks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Corman et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f2b38440a4b9b73ec08d4chttps://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.3.2000045
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Need for additional capacity and improved capability for molecular detection of yellow fever virus in European Expert Laboratories: External Quality Assessment, March 20182018 · 7 citations
  2. 2Advancing preparedness for clinical research during infectious disease epidemics2019 · 21 citations
  3. 3Assays for laboratory confirmation of novel human coronavirus (hCoV-EMC) infections2012 · 380 citations
  4. 4First past the post2003 · 22 citations
  5. 5Developing a framework to assess the costeffectiveness of COMPARE – a global platform for the exchange of sequence-based pathogen data2017 · 9 citations