This review highlights how metal-organic frameworks aid plastic depolymerization, emphasizing energy efficiency and selectivity in transformations.
Plastics are essential in modern life but accumulate as waste. Mechanical reprocessing reduces material quality, whereas thermochemical routes require harsh conditions and are costly to upgrade. Together, these factors hinder the large-scale recovery of plastics into equivalent materials. Metal–organic frameworks provide a programmable platform where reticular design fixes porosity and positions well-defined Lewis, Brønsted, redox, and photoredox sites that can preconcentrate oligomers and align scissile bonds for activation. These attributes enable complementary pathways spanning hydrolysis, alcoholysis, aminolysis, photo-oxidation, electrocatalysis, and MOF-derived transformations, with adsorption-guided capture-to-catalysis workflows emerging as integrative schemes. In this review, we establish common figures of merit such as space–time yield, monomer selectivity and purity, energy intensity, site-normalized turnover, and solvent or corrosion footprints. These metrics are connected to design rules that involve active-site chemistry and transport through semi-crystalline substrates. We also emphasize durability under hot aqueous, alcoholic, or oxidative conditions as essential for producing polymer-grade products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: