Observation reveals niche partitioning and habitat preferences of two thrush species in urban settings, suggesting structural diversity supports coexistence.
Urbanization reshapes bird communities by filtering species according to their ecological traits, often reducing richness, altering relative abundances, and favoring a subset of functionally tolerant species that dominate urban assemblages. Some native taxa are able to inhabit cities, even using them as stepping stones for range expansion. We examined urban habitat use, microhabitat selection, and potential niche partitioning between two range-expanding thrushes (Austral Thrush [Turdus falcklandii] and Rufous-bellied Thrush [Turdus rufiventris]) in two urban settlements in the Pampas region, Argentina. Using 131 transects across green areas and urbanized zones, we related abundance patterns to habitat features at the transect scale and evaluated microhabitat selection at the individual level. Austral Thrush abundance increased with herbaceous cover, tree cover, and even concrete surfaces, suggesting a relatively high tolerance to fragmented green spaces within dense urban matrices. In contrast, Rufous-bellied Thrush showed a positive association with tree cover, avoided tall buildings, and reached higher abundance in the smaller city, consistent with its recent arrival in the region and preference for less intensively urbanized environments. Microhabitat data revealed marked vertical stratification: Austral Thrush foraged almost exclusively at ground level on grassy or bare substrates, while Rufous-bellied Thrush used trees, shrubs, and vines more frequently. These differences reflect fine-scale resource partitioning that may contribute to reducing niche overlap and favor the coexistence of both species in recently colonized urban areas, while recognizing that such dynamics occur within broader bird assemblages where multiple species interact and compete for space and resources. Our findings highlight that even closely related species can respond divergently to urban structure, and that maintaining structural and substrate heterogeneity within cities may help support native bird diversity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vázquez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: