Observational analysis reveals local governments are influenced by party networks and regional policies, suggesting broader implications for human rights activism.
Between 2019 and 2020, amidst national-level democratic backsliding under the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, a wave of Polish municipal governments adopted a template of discriminatory policies, creating so-called “LGBT Free Zones” and countering a growing trend of “human rights cities.” What factors might explain this discriminatory diffusion? Drawing on three research traditions regarding diffusion—the social movement literature on direct/indirect linkages between individuals, an intergovernmentalist perspective on the kinds of relations between governmental units, and the Europeanization literature—we explain variation in the enactment of “zones” across 2,477 municipalities using a multinomial logit model. We find that local “zones” are most likely implemented, first, where direct channels link local elected officials to PiS's party network and, second, where higher-level units (counties) also implement “zones,” indicating that government-to-government networks also catalyze diffusion. Finally, we find diffusion less likely among geographic neighbors insofar as municipalities perceive enacting “zones” as costly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stenberg et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: