Mixed-methods analysis reveals risk perception influences LLM acceptance in students, suggesting educational adaptation.
The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education introduced powerful tools such as ChatGPT, which students increasingly use for academic purposes. However, these technologies present significant challenges for higher education, such as the risk of undermining academic integrity through AI-assisted performance and the uncertainty around proper use. This paper seeks to understand the benefits and risks university students perceive regarding LLM usage and how those influence their acceptance and use of related services in higher education. To this end, we employed a mixed-method approach. Using the UTAUT2 model extended by a Risk Expectancy construct, we conducted an online survey and follow-up interviews with university students. The results indicated that while students perceive considerable risks related to LLMs, those do not impact their usage and behavioral intention. We discuss this phenomenon based on the qualitative interview analysis and suggest research directions for future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rücker et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: