This analysis demonstrates improved compressive strength and sustainability in concrete using glass powder and waste materials.
This study evaluates concrete made with three waste-derived substitutions: glass powder (GP) as a partial cement replacement (0, 5, 10%), stone dust (SD) as a sand replacement (0, 10, 20%), and waste ceramic tiles (CT) as a coarse-aggregate replacement (0, 25, 50, 75%). A constant mix ratio of 1:1.5:3 and water- to-binder ratio of 0.45 were used, with 4×8 in. cylinders cast and tested at 28 days for compressive strength and unit weight. The control mix reached 7.85 MPa and 2094 kg/m3. Introducing GP at 10% and CT at 50% produced the highest strength, 11.20 MPa (≈43% above control). Strong performance was also observed for 5% GP + 20% SD + 25% CT (10.93 MPa, ≈39% above control). SD alone improved at 20% (8.49 MPa), but excessive fine/coarse replacement or certain combinations with GP reduced gains. Unit weight ranged from ≈1910–2178 kg/m3; mixes with 25–50% CT tended to be denser and often stronger, whereas 75% CT generally lowered both density and strength. Overall, moderate levels at 5–10% GP, 20% SD, and 25–50% CT, delivered the best balance of strength and density, demonstrating a practical route to performance and sustainability by reducing virgin material demand and diverting waste from landfills.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asaduzzaman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: