Structured interviews reveal evolving responses to probabilistic tornado warnings in residents, indicating varied risk perceptions.
In this study we examine how individuals perceive and respond to probabilistic tornado information that evolves across different space and time scales. We conducted 36 structured in-person interviews in July of 2024 with residents of the southeastern U.S. to examine (a) probabilistic tornado forecasts that evolve from a 2-hour, “warn-on-forecast” or “WoFS” lead-time to a probabilistic tornado warning and (b) evolving tornado warnings that update on the order of minutes, with both deterministic and probabilistic conditions. We found notable variability in how people assess evolving tornado forecast information across information types, formats, and locations. Despite the novelty of the WoFS graphic, respondents generally understood what was being communicated. Many participants drew comparisons with a tornado watch and indicated that they would respond in similar ways. As the presented tornado forecast information evolved from the probabilistic WoFS graphic to a probabilistic tornado warning, participants also evolved from saying they would not immediately worry and would attend to future forecasts to indicating they would more seriously consider the risk to themselves. This evolution seemed to be a function of the change in spatial and temporal scales. We also observed some different interpretations of risk based on the locations respondents were in for the evolving warnings and based on whether the warning was probabilistic or deterministic. Overall, our findings demonstrate how each type and format of tornado forecast information has strengths and weaknesses that result in tradeoffs among different ways of communicating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wirz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: