This research identifies antimicrobial resistance in E. coli and coagulase-positive staphylococci in petting zoo animals, suggesting significant implications for public health.
The role of petting zoo animals in the dissemination of disease has been widely studied, yet understanding the potential reservoir of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in these centres has not been explored in the United Kingdom (UK). To understand the carriage of AMR pathogens within petting zoos, this study aimed to identify AMR in E. coli and Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG) isolated from faeces and skin, respectively, including selective cultures for ESBL-E. coli and methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Faecal samples and skin swabs were collected from 166 petted mammals across eight UK centres to recover E. coli and coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS), respectively, through enrichment culture methods, plating onto non-selective (tryptone bile-x agar, mannitol salt agar) and selective media (ESBL ChromID, mannitol salt agar with 6 mg/L oxacillin). Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion, covering eight classes of antimicrobials. Antimicrobial usage records from the past 12-months were obtained from 7/8 centres. Overall, 145/166 faecal samples yielded 223 E. coli isolates, with an overall AMR prevalence of 42.6%. Thirteen E. coli isolates (from 8.5% of animals) were classified as multidrug-resistant. ESBL-producing E. coli were detected in 5/166 faecal samples. From 166 skin swabs, 84 yielded CoPS isolates, with S. aureus (n = 70), SIG (n = 13) and S. hyicus (n = 1) identified. Overall, 25.3% of SIG isolates exhibited resistance to at least one antimicrobial. Antimicrobial usage correlated positively with AMR prevalence for E. coli (p < 0.001), though was not associated with multidrug-resistance. This study demonstrates for the first time the presence of AMR within bacteria isolated from UK petting zoo animals, highlighting this reservoir of AMR bacteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishigaki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: