This framework integrates disease models and public behavior, emphasizing misinformation impacts on pandemic responses.
Pandemic response strategies have traditionally relied on classical epidemiological models such as SIR and SEIR, which primarily focus on the biological transmission of infectious diseases. However, these models often overlook the significant influence of public behavior, trust in science, and the rapid dissemination of misinformation. This paper proposes an integrated conceptual framework that bridges these gaps by combining epidemic modeling with behavioral and informational dynamics in what is termed a "Dual-Spread Model." Through a synthesis of literature, historical examples (COVID-19, H1N1, Ebola), and illustrative diagrams, the study reveals how misinformation, public trust, and community responses can either amplify or suppress disease spread. The framework emphasizes feedback loops between disease outcomes, information flows, and behavioral responses, offering practical insights for policymakers. Key policy recommendations include behavior-informed vaccination campaigns, targeted communication strategies, and coordinated efforts between public health institutions and information platforms. This interdisciplinary approach provides a more robust and adaptive tool for future pandemic preparedness and response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yisa Adeniyi Abolade (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: