Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 18, 2025International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Open Access

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Ceramic and Composite Restorations Bonded with Fourth- and Eighth-Generation Adhesives Using Dual-Cure Resin Cement

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AGAngela Gusiyska

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Evaluation of fourth- and eighth-generation adhesives for indirect restorations, highlighting implications for clinical practice.

Key Points

  • Eighth-generation adhesives provide greater versatility and optimized performance for indirect restorations, enhancing overall clinical success.
  • Both fourth- and eighth-generation adhesives yield high clinical success rates, as evidenced by criteria such as marginal adaptation and aesthetics.
  • Indirect restorations were assessed for factors like retention, postoperative sensitivity, and colour stability over a clinical follow-up.
  • The study underscores the critical role of adhesive system selection in ensuring long-lasting, effective indirect aesthetic restorations.

Cite This Study

Angela Gusiyska (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f3d0c11cb4135751d12b3chttps://doi.org/10.21275/sr251012190528
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share