This analysis argues that link-level models limit machine learning's potential in physical-layer applications, suggesting a scenario-level approach.
Standardized (link-level) channel models such as the 3GPP TDL and CDL models are frequently used to evaluate machine learning (ML)-based physical-layer methods. However, in this work, we argue that a link-level perspective incorporates limiting assumptions, causing unwanted distributional shifts or necessitating impractical online training. An additional drawback is that this perspective leads to (near-)Gaussian channel characteristics. Thus, ML-based models, trained on link-level channel data, do not outperform classical approaches for a variety of physical-layer applications. Particularly, we demonstrate the optimality of simple linear methods for channel compression, estimation, and modeling, revealing the unsuitability of link-level channel models for evaluating ML models. On the upside, adopting a scenario-level perspective offers a solution to this problem and unlocks the relative gains enabled by ML.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Böck et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: