Literature review reveals gaps in collaboration between universities and micro small and medium enterprises, highlighting barriers and enabling factors.
This paper aims to provide a new perspective on the collaboration between Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (M&SMEs) and universities. It seeks to address a gap in the existing literature, which predominantly focuses on the analysis of collaboration between large firms and universities. This partnership is widely regarded as mutually beneficial, as M&SMEs can gain a competitive edge through innovation, while universities could leverage research outcomes and refine their academic programs. The study adopts a systematic literature review methodology and conducts a thematic analysis of articles obtained from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, employing an integrated interpretative framework based on six different perspectives: (1) who (involved actors); (2) what (collaboration inputs and outputs); (3) when (analyzed time span); (4) where (countries); (5) how (implemented collaboration modes); and (6) why (drivers, enabling factors and barriers). A total number of 82 journal articles published between 1987 and 2023 were analyzed. Based on the adopted interpretative framework, a lack of a shared conceptualization of the investigated phenomenon emerged and is associated with a relatively scarce adoption of theoretical frameworks. Moreover, a highly differentiated set of barriers and enabling factors were found, even if their interdependencies appear rarely investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mura et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: