Long-term monitoring reveals significant PM1 levels from traffic, religious events, and local vendors, suggesting targeted control strategies.
More exposure assessment and epidemiological studies are needed for PM 1 , a health-relevant but understudied pollutant, to better understand and mitigate its health risks. This study conducted a 3.5-year PM 1 monitoring campaign in a mountainous community, where air pollutants are more easily trapped, using research-grade low-cost sensors, namely, AS-LUNG-O sets. Nine solar-powered AS-LUNG-O sets were installed at street level, with an additional unit positioned 10 m above the ground to serve as an ambient reference. Street-level sensors were placed 3–5 m from potential sources such as traffic, temples, and vendors. During the 3.5-year period, the overall mean PM 1 concentration across the nine street-level locations was 20.9 ± 11.0 μg/m 3 , compared to 17.0 ± 8.4 μg/m 3 at the elevated site. PM 1 levels were typically higher in winter and on religious days across all locations. Spatial analysis revealed that PM 1 hot spots varied by season, day of the week (weekday vs. weekend), and event type (religious vs. typical days). These hot spots were commonly located near traffic sources, temples, and markets. Notably, most of the maximum PM 1 values across the ten locations occurred on weekdays and typical days, highlighting the unpredictable nature of PM 1 levels influenced by community events. Source contributions to PM 1 were estimated using a generalized additive mixed model; the PM 1 contribution from religious events, traffic, and vendors reached statistical significance. The identified hot spots and source contributions can inform targeted control strategies addressing local pollution sources. This study offers a more representative assessment of PM 1 exposure for local residents than data from ambient monitoring stations or short-term monitoring campaigns. The methodology presented can also be applied in other countries to support community-based PM 1 studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: