This paper explores educational philosophies exemplified by Pipilu and Ramona, highlighting the cultural influences in China and the West.
This paper explores the fundamental differences in educational philosophies between China and the West during the mid-to-late 20th century through a comparative analysis of two classic literary figures: Pipilu from Yuanjie Zheng’s works and Ramona from Beverly Cleary’s writings. Adopting the perspective of naughty children’s spirit of play and grounded in the pedagogy of children’s lit-erature, the research indicates that during the mid-to-late 20th century, Chi-nese education tended to cultivate individuals who conform to social norms through discipline and suppression. In contrast, Western education placed greater emphasis on nurturing well-rounded individuals through guidance, re-specting children’s innate nature and creativity. These differences are pro-foundly reflected in the establishment of educational objectives and the se-lec-tion of pedagogical methods in both contexts, revealing the influence of cul-ture. This study provides a historical and cultural perspective for understanding the divergences in Chinese and Western educational concepts during the mid-to-late 20th century, offering insights for contemporary educational re-form.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jinbao Su (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: