Observational cohort study reveals dysphagia impacts nutritional status and increases mortality in elderly, highlighting need for intervention.
Background/Objectives: Dysphagia is a common condition among older adults, associated with significant health risks. This prospective, open-label observational cohort study aimed to determine the prevalence of dysphagia and its impact on nutritional status and clinical outcomes in elderly residents of six long-term care facilities. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 65 years were screened using the 3 oz Water Swallow Test (WST); those with dysphagia were followed for 6 months. Nutritional status was evaluated with the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF), the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), and the SARC-F questionnaire. Anthropometric and body composition measurements were also obtained. Results: Among 656 patients screened, 188 (28.6%) had dysphagia (median age 90 years; 89.9% females). Mild dysphagia was present in 34.0%, while 66.0% had moderate-to-severe dysphagia. At baseline, patients with moderate-to-severe dysphagia had significantly lower BMI (18.4 vs. 20.6 kg/m2, p = 0.014), smaller calf circumference (24.0 vs. 28.0 cm, p = 0.005), and higher SARC-F score (8 vs. 7, p = 0.028). Bioimpedance analysis showed lower fat mass (6.7 vs. 12.9 kg, p < 0.001) and fat mass% (14.7 vs. 25.4%, p < 0.001), and higher FFM% (85.3 vs. 74.6%, p < 0.001). At 6 months, BMI, calf circumference, handgrip strength, fat mass, and fat mass% resulted significantly lower in patients with moderate-to-severe dysphagia. A total of 23 participants (12.2%) died during follow-up, with a higher mortality rate in the moderate-to-severe group (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.20–7.59, p = 0.044); aspiration pneumonia was the leading cause (21.7%). Conclusions: Dysphagia significantly affects nutritional status and survival in elderly residents of long-term care facilities. Early personalized nutritional intervention is pivotal to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Formisano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: