Observational analysis reveals species-specific effects of cryoprotectants and cooling regimes on sperm viability.
Global amphibian populations are declining rapidly and the development of effective cryopreservation protocols for germ cells has become a critical tool in ex situ conservation programs. Post-thaw membrane-integrity viability in four endangered Korean amphibians (Dryophytes suweonensis, Pelophylax chosenicus, Kaloula borealis, and Hynobius yangi) were evaluated. Sperm were cryopreserved using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 10–30% (v/v) in combination with 0.6 M sucrose, and were frozen at two suspension heights (5 cm vs. 10 cm) above liquid nitrogen. Post-thaw membrane-integrity viability was assessed using a SYBR-14/propidium iodide membrane-integrity assay (LIVE/DEAD kit). Low concentrations of permeating cryoprotectants (CPs) improved membrane-integrity viability, whereas high concentrations led to high toxicity, particularly with DMSO. Across species, DMF produced the highest membrane-integrity viability and the most consistent performance. The cooling rate influenced membrane-integrity viability, with samples frozen at 10 cm exhibiting greater viability, reflecting the balance between intracellular ice formation during rapid cooling and solution effects during slow cooling. Optimal conditions for D. suweonensis were 15% DMSO at 10 cm (86.5% membrane-integrity viability); for P. chosenicus, 10% DMF at 10 cm (75.5%); and for K. borealis, 10% DMSO at 5 cm (81.6% membrane-integrity viability). Hynobius yangi showed modest improvement under 15% DMF at 5 cm (19.7%), although overall membrane-integrity viability was low. ED50 modeling indicated species-specific thresholds requiring low CP concentrations. Sperm cryopreservation outcomes in amphibians are strongly influenced by CP type, concentration, cooling regime, and species physiology. GLM and ED50 modeling provide a methodological framework for refining cryopreservation strategies for non-model, endangered species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: