Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals buyout strategy deters entry in markets with low capacity and consumer preference.
We study the optimal capacity strategies of an incumbent firm facing potential entry in a capacity-constrained market: either allowing the entrant to enter or maintaining monopoly power by buying out external capacity. To capture the interaction between the incumbent and the potential entrant, we employ a two-stage game. Our analysis shows that it is optimal for the incumbent to adopt a buyout strategy to deter entry only when both the external market capacity and its consumer preference are low. Regarding the entrant, we find that developing a differentiated product is not always the best choice. When the incumbent's consumer preference is relatively low, it is more profitable for the entrant to introduce a similar product, thereby intensifying competition and driving the incumbent out of the market. Finally, we show that when a firm's consumer preference is high, stronger competition instead induces the firm to set a higher product price.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: