Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gas chromatography distinguishes sex in paracentrotus lividus gonads, suggesting implications for gastronomy.
Background: The edible gonads of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus are highly valued, yet sex cannot be determined externally, limiting selective harvest and quality control. Objective: To test whether headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME–GC–MS) combined with chemometrics can discriminate sex from gonadal volatilomes. Methods: Gonads from 29 individuals (21 females, 8 males) were profiled by HS-SPME–GC–MS. Spectral data were modeled with Partial Least Squares–Linear Discriminant Analysis (PLS–LDA); Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) scores highlighted key features, and Mann–Whitney tests (FDR-adjusted) assessed univariate differences. Tentative identifications were assigned by library match and cu-rated for potential environmental artefacts. Results: Chemometric modeling yielded a clear female–male separation. Female gonads were enriched in low-odour-threshold oxy-genates—aldehydes (hexanal, heptanal) and alcohols (1-penten-3-ol, 1-octen-3-ol)—together with diet-linked monoterpenes (e.g., D-limonene), consistent with PUFA LOX/HPL pathways and macroalgal inputs. Male gonads were dominated by sat-urated/branched hydrocarbons and long-chain alcohols with limited direct odour impact. Minor aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., styrene; 1,3-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-benzene) were re-tained as environmental/artefact markers and excluded from biological interpretation. Conclusions: HS-SPME–GC–MS volatilomics coupled with PLS–LDA effectively distin-guishes the sex of P. lividus gonads and rationalizes reported sensory differences. The marker set offers a basis for future non-destructive sexing workflows, pending confirma-tion with retention indices, authentic standards, and GC-olfactometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibanco-Cañete et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: