Non-randomized study finds IL-6 inhibition does not impair glucose uptake or insulin sensitivity in RA, suggesting safety for exercise therapy.
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease, and exercise is a key non-pharmacological therapy. We examined whether IL-6 inhibition, a common biologic treatment for RA, impairs the acute metabolic benefits of exercise, given IL-6’s proposed role as a mediator of exercise-induced glucose metabolism. This was a single-center, non-randomized study involving 20 postmenopausal women with RA (10 on IL-6i, 10 on TNF-αi). Participants underwent a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HEC) and Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ([ 18 F] FDG PET/MRI) to assess whole-body and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Muscle biopsies were performed before and 240 minutes after a 30-minute moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise session to analyze molecular responses, including RNA sequencing and protein expression. Participants had a mean age of 57.8 ± 5.1 years and a mean BMI of 28.2 ± 4.9 kg/m². Disease duration averaged 18.0 ± 7.5 years, and both groups had comparable clinical characteristics. Acute exercise did not elicit significant between-group differences in insulin sensitivity (M-value: 4.51 ± 1.34 vs. 4.28 ± 0.87; p-value >0.05) or skeletal muscle glucose uptake, indicating that IL-6 inhibition does not impair the metabolic responses to acute exercise. Comparing post to pre-exercise, IL-6i participants exhibited increased GLUT4 expression ( p-value = 0.01) and distinct cytokine profiles, including elevated IL-8 ( p-value = 0.04) and IL-10 ( p-value = 0.02) levels. RNA-seq analysis showed comparable pathway enrichment between groups, with upregulation of TNF-α and IL-6-JAK-STAT3 signaling. IL-6 inhibition does not blunt the acute metabolic benefits of exercise in RA, supporting its safety as a non-pharmacological intervention. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04927546).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: