This framework integrates machine learning and physics-informed neural networks to enhance damage detection, suggesting improved accuracy in structural analysis.
With advancements in AI, data-driven methods such as autoencoders (AEs) have been widely used for damage identification through anomaly detection. However, AEbased methods primarily learn identity mappings from healthy-state data, making them less effective in detecting subtle damage. This study presents a physics-informed, machine learning-driven structural digital twin (SDT) framework for damage identification using anomaly detection. By incorporating physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), the framework reduces discrepancies between finite element model (FEM) predictions and real structural responses, enabling more accurate anomaly detection. The proposed approach is evaluated using the numerical ASCE benchmark structure. It outperforms AE and LSTM-AE baseline methods in comparatively smaller damage scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: