Descriptive research reveals how doctoral programmes influence dissertation supervision and satisfaction in Kenyan universities post-COVID-19.
This study examines the perceived value of doctoral programmes and their impact on dissertation supervision satisfaction in Kenyan universities in the post-COVID-19 era. Using a descriptive research design, data were collected through questionnaires from 63 PhD students at the dissertation stage, yielding a 90% response rate. The Advisory Working Alliance Inventory (AWAI) was applied to assess rapport, apprenticeship, and individuation in supervision relationships. Results showed that most students reported efficient rapport (67.7%) and high apprenticeship (76.9%) levels, indicating strong satisfaction with supervisory relationships. However, individuation was relatively low (41.5%), suggesting challenges in fostering autonomy. Chi-square tests revealed no significant associations between age and supervision dimensions, while gender differences were significant for identification-individuation, with female students more likely to identify with supervisors. The study concludes that doctoral supervision satisfaction is shaped by both interpersonal and institutional dynamics, influenced but not determined by demographic factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mbogo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: