October 20, 2025Dermatologic TherapyOpen Access

Preliminary Clinical Study of Monopolar Versus Bipolar Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency for Facial Rejuvenation

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Bipolar fractional microneedling radiofrequency led to superior results in reducing pore size and volume compared to monopolar.
Even though both treatments improved skin texture, bipolar elicited more pain and longer recovery periods.
Participants expressed satisfaction after treatment, with mild side effects like erythema present but without severe complications.
Skin elasticity significantly increased post-treatment on both sides; however, no major differences in hydration or TEWL indices.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Pilot study compares monopolar and bipolar fractional microneedling radiofrequency, revealing differences in skin elasticity and pore characteristics.

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f5a78aab63786de5b4605d https://doi.org/10.1155/dth/3331924

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Pilot study compares monopolar and bipolar fractional microneedling radiofrequency, revealing differences in skin elasticity and pore characteristics.

Preliminary Clinical Study of Monopolar Versus Bipolar Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency for Facial Rejuvenation

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Preliminary Clinical Study of Monopolar Versus Bipolar Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency for Facial Rejuvenation

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider