Analysis reveals courts issue firearms prohibitions in civil protection orders infrequently, suggesting need for reforms.
Firearms make domestic violence more dangerous. Civil protection orders (“CPOs”) can include firearms prohibitions to separate abusers from firearms. This study reviewed 90% of CPO cases ( N = 3,451) filed in South Carolina in 2019. The study found that when courts had discretion whether to issue a firearms prohibition (here, under state law), courts tended not to do so (32% of all eligible cases). When law automatically applied a firearms prohibition to cases (here, under federal law), courts typically included them (85% of all eligible cases), but not always, as 15% of petitioners who were entitled to the federal remedy were left unprotected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: