Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study finds the cop number is 3 for the complement of the Shrikhande graph, elucidating key properties of Forb classes.
The game of cops and robber is a two-player turn-based game played on a graph where the cops try to capture the robber. The cop number of a graph G, denoted by $c(G)$ is the minimum number of cops required to capture the robber. For a given class of graphs F, let c( F):=(F)|F∈ F\, and let Forb( F) denote the class of F-free graphs. We show that the complement of the Shrikhande graph is (4K₁,C_)-free for any ≥ 6 and has the cop number~$3$. This provides a counterexample for the conjecture proposed by Sivaraman (arxiv, 2019) which states that if G is C_-free for all ≥ 6, then c(G)≤ 2. This also gives a negative answer to the question posed by Turcotte (Discrete Math. 345:112660 (2022)) 112660. to check whether $c($Forb(pK₁))=p-2. Turcotte also posed the question to check whether $c($Forb(pK₁+K₂))≤ p+1, for p≥ 3. We prove that this result indeed holds. We also generalize this result for Forb(pK₁+qK₂). Motivated by the results of Baird et al. (Contrib. Discrete Math. 9:70--84 (2014)) and Turcotte and Yvon (Discrete Appl. Math. 301:74--98 (2021)), we define the upper threshold degree and lower threshold degree for a particular class of graphs and show some computational advantage to find the cop number using these.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Char et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: