Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Post hoc analysis compares plazomicin pharmacokinetics in Indian and non-Indian patients with complicated urinary tract infections, suggesting comparable exposure levels.
Multidrug–resistant Enterobacteriaceae are a primary cause of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) worldwide. This study compared pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of plazomicin among Indian versus non–India participants. This was a post hoc analysis of PK data from the Phase 2 study (ACHN–490‐002), a multicenter, double–blind, randomized, comparator–controlled study. Eligible participants (aged 18‐85 years, body weight ≤100 kg) with documented/suspected cUTI or acute pyelonephritis received either 10 or 15 mg/kg plazomicin. Among 91 participants, 70 were non–Indian and 21 were Indian. For the 15 mg/kg dose, plazomicin demonstrated a higher area under the plasma time–concentration curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC 0‐24 ) and maximum concentration (C max ) compared to the 10 mg/kg dose, which showed greater variability. At the 10 mg/kg dose, Indian participants had a mean AUC 0‐24 of 163.0 mg•h/L, while non–Indian participants had a mean AUC 0‐24 of 185.0 mg•h/L. The estimated mean plazomicin AUC 0‐24 values were comparable between Indian and non–Indian participants. The mean C max for Indian participants was 17.2 mg•h/L, and for non–Indian participants it was 15.7 mg•h/L. Dose–normalized AUC 0‐24 and C max point estimates were 110% and 103%, respectively. This showed comparable plazomicin exposure in Indian and non–Indian patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupte et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: