Analysis shows dark energy influences matter density and power spectrum in expanding universe models, indicating significant structure formation differences.
Observations favor cosmological models with a time-varying dark energy component. But how does dynamical dark energy (DDE) influence the growth of structure in an expanding Universe? We investigate this question using high-resolution N-body simulations based on a DDE cosmology constrained by first-year DESI data (DESIY1$+$DDE), characterized by a 4% lower Hubble constant (H₀) and 10% higher matter density (Ω₀) than the Planck-2018 $Λ$CDM model. We examine the impact on the matter power spectrum, halo abundances, clustering, and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). We find that DESIY1$+$DDE exhibits a 10% excess in power at small scales and a 15% suppression at large scales, driven primarily by its higher Ω₀. This trend is reflected in the halo mass function: DESIY1$+$DDE predicts up to 70% more massive halos at $z = 2$ and a 40% excess at $z = 0.3$. Clustering analysis reveals a 3.71% shift of the BAO peak towards smaller scales in DESIY1$+$DDE, consistent with its reduced sound horizon compared to Planck18 Measurements of the BAO dilation parameter $α$, using halo samples with DESI-like tracer number densities across $0 < z < 1.5$, agree with the expected DESIY1$+$DDE-to-Planck18 sound horizon ratio. After accounting for cosmology-dependent distances, the simulation-based observational dilation parameter closely matches DESI Y1 data. We find that the impact of DDE is severely limited by current observational constraints, which strongly favor cosmological models -- whether including DDE or not -- with a tightly constrained parameter Ω₀h²≈ 0.143, within 1-2% uncertainty. Indeed, our results demonstrate that variations in cosmological parameters, particularly Ω₀, have a greater influence on structure formation than the DDE component alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishiyama et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: