Observational analysis links persistent radio sources to fast radio bursts, suggesting unique magnetar environments.
The rare association of three persistent radio sources (confirmed PRS1 and PRS2, candidate PRS3) with repeating fast radio bursts (FRB 20121102A, 20190520B, 20201124A) offers a unique probe into their magneto-ionic environments. PRSs are attributed to synchrotron emission from relativistic charged particles of magnetar wind nebula (MWN) powered by spin-down magnetohydrodynamic wind or internal magnetic field decay. Using a multizone hydrodynamic model, we track MWN evolution to constrain magnetar progenitor properties. For PRS1 and PRS2, we find an equipartition radius Rₑq ~ 0.1 pc that is consistent with the radio scintillation estimates ($> 0.03$ pc) and radio imaging limits ($<0.7$ pc). This compact size favors low expansion speeds and large initial spin periods, Pᵢ 10 ms, ruling out millisecond magnetar progenitors. Given Pᵢ 10 ms, a current size of ~ 0.1 pc, a supernova kinetic energy E_ SN ~ 10⁵⁰-10⁵¹ erg and an ejecta mass M ~ 3-10 \; M_, the PRS age is t ~ 10-10² yr. PRSs with $t>20$ years require an internal field (Bᵢnt ~ 10¹⁶-1016.5\;G) with a decay timescale td ~ 10-102.5 yr. The slowest field decay (td,max ~ 500 yr) favors sub-energetic supernovae (ESN ~ 10⁵⁰ erg) with massive ejecta (M 10\; M_) and low ionization fraction (~ 3%). For the sub-energetic scenario for the confirmed PRSs, we predict a cooling break at $100-150$ gigahertz at 20-40 \; μJy and self-absorption near 200 megahertz at 180\; μJy. For PRS3, a rotation-powered MWN is viable only if t ~ 10 yr; an inverted spectrum beyond 150 gigahertz would rule out this scenario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahaman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: